Sample size calculation for anthropometry and mortality

Home Forums Survey Design and Sampling Sample size calculation for anthropometry and mortality

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Yengi Emmanuel 9 years, 12 months ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2238

    Yengi Emmanuel
    Participant

    Dear forum members,

    I kindly need your guidance. What standard SMART survey estimates should I use for estimating anthropometry and mortality sample sizes in an area were no survey has not been conducted in.

    Thanks
    Yengi Emmanuel

    #2241

    SMART
    Keymaster

    Hello,

    There are several parameters you need to calculate sample size (estimated prevalence, desired precision, design effect for cluster surveys, average household size, proportion of children under 5, non-response rate, size of total population if small and level of confidence). Assuming you’re referring specifically to estimated prevalence/death rate that need significant consideration, continue reading below.

    When calculating sample size, the Estimated Prevalence for the indicator of interest should be as close as possible to what you think the real prevalence will be.

    1) If there is no previous information about the prevalence of your main indicator in the target population, gather all available information about the indicator of interest in the country/region. Look at different sources such as surveys in similar area/context and season, for example:

    Previous survey in neighbouring areas
    Surveillance data including proportions of children visiting clinics with malnutrition
    Program staff from MoH, UNICEF, etc.
    National demographic data.
    MICS or DHS survey data done in the past or neighbouring district
    Passive screening data from permanent health centre sites
    Health workers, religious leaders

    2) Consider how the prevalence has changed since the existing information was collected (has the situation deteriorated/improved?). Do not use previous survey results blindly without adjusting for differences between then and now. Justify your decision using contextual data such as:

    Aggravating factors
    Seasonality
    Implementation of nutrition/feeding
    Crises
    Food security
    Population movement

    3) Determine the range of plausible values of prevalence and use the higher number (closer to 50%) to be conservative and achieve an acceptable precision.

    Increasing your estimate of prevalence (closer to 50%) will increase your sample size. Similarly for mortality sample size calculation, estimate the crude death rate accessing available information to determine a range and choose the higher end to be conservative. Be careful not to grossly overestimate.

    SMART Team

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 12 months ago by  SMART.
    • This reply was modified 9 years, 12 months ago by  SMART.
    #2244

    Yengi Emmanuel
    Participant

    Hi
    Thank very much for your help

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Recent Replies