[AshParticipant]

Hi there,

Thanks for the response.

But the issue is we are doing entry both at the individual and at the HH box. Reason being the individual analyze only CMR and not the U5MR. But entry and analysis at HH would allow you to get both CMR and U5MR.

All the configuration and selection of age bands being similar we noticed two of the lap tops individual analysis is not working while the analysis at HH is okay.

Another notice is that when you try to merge two or more surveys for one or use weighted analysis, the entry at the individual level is lost while the entry and analysis at HH box is intact.

I would appreciate speedy guidance on the above two at your earliest time possible.

Thanks for your support and time in advance.

Best, Ash

[AshParticipant]

Dear SMART team,

I am having an almost similar challenge with the ENA software entering death records. We have stationed 8 lap tops and centrally entering data as double entry exercise but two of the lap tops refused to calculate the death rate. In fact, most of the time the mortality summary at HH box do not work while mortality result at the individual level is being calculated.

Is there any trouble shooting or software program related advice that you can share with me to improve the inconsistency reading and malfunctioning of either of the death records analysis box would be highly appreciated.

I look forward to receiving guidance on the above point at the earliest.

Best regards, Ash

[AshParticipant]

Hi there,

Making the correction or remark note on the raw data is fine, however, are the two subsequent entries analyzed differently rather than for a single households only. In that case, it might distort the result as the two are captured differently.

Your advice is highly appreciated and look forward to receiving it very soon.

Best, Ash

[Author]

Posts